To Whom It May Concern
A letter inspired by His Majesty’s interview with Fareed Zakaria at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
To whom it may concern,
In Jordan, during the last ten years, there has been a pattern of governing. Sadly this pattern, I think, has become so ingrained in the system that it can no longer be seen or identified; it has become a part of who we are. In a way, the legitimacy and the substance of such initiatives can’t be even debated or questioned. Why? Because of the “royal touch”. Initiatives became the name of the game – initiative this and initiative that. Excitement and anticipation hits the roof, our hopes get inflated, and we throw all of our eggs in that one basket. Excitement dwindles down, our hopes deflate again and the initiative is moved to the ICU where it will later on die. The same is happening now with the “decentralization” plan, a plan that we are yet to see or debate. A plan to decentralize a country of six million; a country that is smaller than most. A plan that I am willing to bet on its failure, because the society was not involved. The society has been ignored. The society seems to only exist in our capacity-lacking minds. His majesty referred to “capacity building” in the context of political reform, I hope that he was talking about the government and it’s tools becoming more equipped to deal with a free society that treats individuals as human beings with rights. I also hope that his majesty wasn’t talking about sculpting the society to fit some sort of a preconceived “end state”. The best way to build democratic values is by actually letting people practice it. It is not talking about it. It is not about planning and designing it. It is about the people learning from their mistakes. It is about the people making choices and bearing the consequences of such choices.
In Jordan we don’t get to “vote off” our anger or dissatisfaction. Our anger fuels our desperation and frustrations. Our hopes for the future become the only way to survive the present. A present that is increasingly consuming any hope we have for that future. In the interview, his majesty mentioned that we are having an early election. The date not yet specified. But why are we having an “early” election to begin with? That wasn’t mentioned: The last parliament was dissolved as per his majesty’s decree – a decision that is two years late – but late is better than never, eh? His majesty talked about “reforming” the election process in a way that makes it more transparent, participative, and capable of producing high quality parliamentarians. Sounds good, right? One word is missing however, and it is the key to any political reform, as a matter of fact it is the definition of democracy. The missing word is: representation. Any election reform that doesn’t make representation its top priority will fail and will only serve to maintain the “tsk” and the status-quo, which the king mentioned.
In the interview his majesty talked about how his reform agenda has faced many obstacles in the form of the “tsk” mentality- meaning “no” or “forget about it”. He also talked about how some members of the society view some reform efforts as being part of a foreign or a Zionist agenda to change the “face” of Jordan, a face who some are trying too hard to paint with their own brushes. Our Face is our people and their hopes. Yet, it seems that his majesty forgot that one of his most powerful ministers, Mr. Nayef El-Qadi, the interior minister, is second to the Islamic Action Front in using the term “Zionist agenda” when describing any form of opposition to his majesty’s government.
Also, recently, Saleh El-Gallab was appointed as the head of the entity called Jordan “TV”. Gallab is a figure known for his extreme approach in dealing with opposition usually using terms such treasonous to describe calls for reform. Beyond attacking local opposition his favorite targets include but aren’t limited to: Syria, Hamas, Hizbullah, Iran, Iraq, Shietes, Israel, and the US. He is to Jordan what Glen Beck and Sean Hannity are to the US. What kind of signal does the appointment of such a figure send? I am assuming that confrontation will be the name of the game. Extreme figures are given more power and tools. Controversial figures known for their usual “tsk” approach are promoted. Mixed signals are the only signals I see. Why? I don’t know. Maybe it is just a way to create some sort of distraction. Maybe having extreme figures can help our so-slow-paced “reform” efforts. Maybe they can create an environment where policies are shoved through. I don’t know. But my guess is that with the absence of any oversight entity, the worse is yet to come. Unchecked power corrupts. It creates an environment that not only encourages bad behavior but also enables it. It brings the worst out of people. Good intentions are good but not nearly enough. They are great, but not enough.
Yes I am pessimistic, just like his majesty. However, unlike the king my pessimism is local in nature. It is not about the prospects of a solution to the Palestinian issue – it is about the prospects of progress in Jordan. The progress toward a more democratic society. A society that gets to choose.
Before I close my quasi-letter, a couple of things about information and censorship. If we know. If we have access to information, we will have the motivation to act and to become better. But if we know, and yet don’t act we’ll become worse. If we know and yet we are banned from reacting we’ll remain the “silenced majority” that so many wrongly call the “silent majority”. We’ll be primed to accept anything, be it good or bad. We’ll become even more passive and more disengaged. We’ll become the nation of “who cares?” – and we are almost there thanks to many of the failed policies and their intended and unintended consequences.
Finally, once lost, trust is almost impossible to be regained. The biggest danger is when people lose the trust they have in their leaders, not when they lose the trust in policies. Policies can be replaced and changed. But for people, someone must and should be held accountable for the failed policies. And when we, the people, have no way of holding officials accountable, when we lack the means to vote on policies and decisions that affect our lives, we lose trust in the whole system – not just parts of it. We lose trust in the whole pyramid, not only the bottom or the middles of it. In our minds we know who should be held accountable. So a word of advice: delegate responsibility and decision making to the people and their representatives for the sake of both the people and the state. For the sake of our future and our children.
Just Do it!
Sincerely,
A deeply concerned and frustrated citizen,
Mohanned
Photo from related article in The Guardian.














