Arts&Culture | فنون وثقافة

the world of arts and culture       عالم الثقافة و الفنون

Featured | قصص مختارة

selected stories on 7iber       قصص مختارة على حبر

Have Your Say | شو قولك

be part of the conversation… شارك في الحوار

Video | فيديو

Jordan from behind the lens الاردن من ورا العدسه

Wikileaks in Arabic | ويكيليكس بالعربي

translation of cables mentioning jordan ترجمة برقيات التي تذكر الاردن

Home » Featured | قصص مختارة, Headline | المقال الرئيسي, Opinions | أراء, Politics

The Aqaba Terror Attack: A Comment

August 4, 2010 8 Comments

By Mohanned

aqaba The Aqaba Terror Attack: A Comment

I guess one can say that it is unfortunate that the PM of Jordan was abroad after the rockets of terror landed in Aqaba Killing Subhi Alawneh, a father, a husband, a son, and a most importantly a human. His Majesty’s absence didn’t help either. However, as someone who believes that the roles of our branches of governing should be redefined and restructured to reflect his Majesty’s vision of having a full-fledged constitutional monarchy, a chance was missed. The government and its tools could have played a major role in managing the sad event in a way that might have helped in laying the foundations for the true institutionalization of the governing of the country.

While most of us would agree that the management of the crisis on the ground level was professional, I doubt that the same impression applies to the media and PR aspects. Many in our country, whether we like it or not, do actually sympathize with terrorists and their agenda. Public opinion numbers as evidenced by the multiple PEW attitude reports provide significant support that we have a major problem when it comes the Jordanian public supporting (or at least describing it as “justifiable”) terrorism. Such numbers, I believe, apply more to the heinous crimes which occur abroad and not on Jordanian soil. Either way, the 2005 hotel attacks in Amman did play a major role in deflating such numbers in Jordan, but it is still a major problem.

I am not trying to delve into an attempt to explain the worrying numbers; I am simply trying to point to the fact that our government could have done a better job in managing the event in a way that delivers a PR blow to the terrorists and their agenda. The fact the Subhi Alawneh, may god bless his soul and give his family strength, and the other victims could have been any one of us means a lot on so many levels. Why, some might ask. As a Jordanian I do have a little bit of knowledge about how some might try to justify such horrible acts. When the 2005 hotel attacks occurred, I heard many who said that the victims “shouldn’t have been in the hotels”. From those people’s religious point of view, hotels are “Amaken Fojoor”, that is, immoral places where Muslims shouldn’tbe. Such targeted attacks are somewhat justifiable to many. Reforming such beliefs won’t happen overnight, but we should take every step possible to make sure that they don’t spread further.

Fortunately, we Jordanian haven’t witnessed terror attacks that are just aimless in the sense that they kill blindly. To many, the word terrorist in the Arab and Muslim world where terrorism hasn’t hit close to home is simply foreign. In a way the word sounds imported.The picture of terrorist that many have in their minds is that of someone taking revenge from the invaders. It is of someone blowing up a military vehicle or killing some foreign soldiers. School blowers and Friday market bombers are absent from their minds. Whether they intentionally ignore such images or not is beyond what I am trying to get at. The latest rocket attack is just a prototype of such aimless attacks that reflects exactly what the terrorists truly represent. They “simply” don’t value human life, period, so they must be presented to the public as such. The government and the independent media in our country must be a part of a national effort to expose their sick ideology. We all have a role to play. We need to speak up. The message should be centered around the fact that it could have been you, your father, mother, sister, friend, son, daughter, or neighbor that was murdered. The terrorist doesn’t care.

Of course that is not to say that combating terror and religious intolerance is separable from the integrated reform agenda which we must pursue as a country but have failed to do so up to now. There is still an opportunity to gain some good from this tragedy. The people need to see strong leadership. One that is determined and transparent. One that keeps us informed.

  • Batir Wardam

    Thanks Mohannad for the great and genuine analysis. I hope this article has modestly helped in advocating the concept you proposed
    http://www.ammonnews.net/article.aspx?articleNO…

  • Tarawnah

    i agree that there has been a general failure by the Jordanian government, or at least specifically the PR machine..to tackle the issue of terrorism. these are lost opportunities to sway public opinion in jordan, which, as you mentioned, has a significant portion of it that, to some extent, is able to justify these attacks based on society's religious, political and ideological beliefs.

    these acts are indeed terrorism, and the use of that word has never been more pertinant. you are right in suggesting that this is a foreign term for the arab society, however, that is perhaps no better context to allow this word to be redefined – not by western standards, but our own, especially given the fact that the arab and muslim world is the largest victim of these acts. so using that word is important.

    however, HOW it's used is just as important. towing the bush doctrine line that failed miserably for the better part of a decade is not the way to go. it does not speak to local society, it does not change minds, if anything it solidifies the opposite opinion: that the jordanian government is using the same rhetoric of the west because it's in israel's back pocket, thus making these acts justifiable.

    jordanians need to feel that each of these crimes is one that is against them personally, as a people and as a nation. the same sentiments that flooded the streets of the capital in november 2005 need to emerge naturally and used positively.

    fear mongering is not the way to go, and neither is the “with us or against us” route.

  • http://blog.eyas-sharaiha.com/ Eyas

    Yes, if there is any issue that I feel the government is impotent about, it is PR and dealing with the public. We are so good at it when it comes to our image to the international community, but the government often feels crippled when talking to its own people.

    There is somehow fear that if the government takes a fierce PR stance against terror or organized crime against our people in the name of religion, often with external causes or motivations, then the the significant amount of fundamentalists in Jordan would retaliate politically.

    The end result is using vague terms, big words with no context, and very little “real” valauble communication with the public

    And fully agreed with nas's last line.

  • MohannedA

    Fear mongering as you presented it sounds elastic. Exposing and fighting an ideology that is determined on transforming society by force under the guise of the religion is not fear mongering, especially in a society with where more than 90% are muslims. However, using terrorism as an excuse to limit our freedoms is a big no-no. Also, keep in mind that we are talking about Jordan, so our freedoms are yet to be realized and perfected.

  • Tarawnah

    i have no problem with what you said, it's just how it's said that poses a problem. yes, exposing and fighting this ideology is important…but how do you do it that doesn't make you look like you are simply following in the footsteps of the west, and thus reinforcing the general perception that all arab governments are bought and paid for by the good ol'USA? what rhetoric should be used to speak to the muslim masses?

    in my opinion, there is an obvious void that can be filled with islam itself. the religion can be wielded as a force of good – not in a PR-ish way – but in a way that truly resonates throughout society. it is the definition of fighting fire with fire.

    right now, we're just watching the building burn.

    there was a step by the jordanian government to do this a few years back with the introduction of the Amman message. and then there was no continuation. what they did instead is close down mosques after every prayer to ban people from gathering in the most sacred of public spaces that existed in jordan.

    like you said, they submerged notions of freedom in hopes that would provide a greater sense of security. i think we are constantly discovering, along with the rest of the world, that this formula isn't working and it's time to try something different.

  • Lina

    Very well written and I completely agree with you

  • Mohammad

    I apologize for posting a comment quite late but i would really like to discuss a very simple idea with you: Do have the least proof that the rockets were fired by so-called terrorists you’re pointing to? Everyone agrees it is an unaccepted act of terrorism but how can you be so sure it was carried out by terrorists? You didn’t even hint the possibility that it was carried out by israelis for instance..just for instance… and i regret to say that even if it was proven to be done by israelis, and even if they admit it themselves..then nothing will be done at all, neither by the government nor by the people…we wont even see such articles published in our media…i hope i was wrong..i truly do..but let me remind you of the fires that were set by israelis in the north along the jordan river..and i’ll let you remind me of what was done against that..
    thank you for the article

  • Pingback: طريق إلى التطرف؟ | 7iber Dot Com