Arts&Culture | فنون وثقافة

the world of arts and culture       عالم الثقافة و الفنون

Featured | قصص مختارة

selected stories on 7iber       قصص مختارة على حبر

Have Your Say | شو قولك

be part of the conversation… شارك في الحوار

Video | فيديو

Jordan from behind the lens الاردن من ورا العدسه

Wikileaks in Arabic | ويكيليكس بالعربي

translation of cables mentioning jordan ترجمة برقيات التي تذكر الاردن

Home » Opinions | أراء, Society | اجتماعيات

The Fatwa on Facebook

February 11, 2010 13 Comments

2251266697 5304abac74 The Fatwa on Facebook

Photo by Sitmonkey

Written by Moamer Khalaileh

I felt obliged to write something concerning a recent fatwa (religious ruling) by Al Azhar prohibiting the use of Facebook.

Their reasoning: The use of Facebook may lead to illicit relationships between men and women.

The Azhar scholars cited a survey that indicated the social networking site was responsible for 1 in 5 cases of divorce in Egypt due to unlawful relationships between married partners and others.

My initial reaction to the fatwa was anger and indignation. Objectivity is important, so I waited until my temper was more manageable before contemplating the religious ruling and I advise the reader to suspend any frustrations they may have and allow us to display both sides of the argument fairly.

Argument for:

Facebook makes connecting with other people easier, especially in more conservative societies where relationships between men and women are restricted. This freedom opens the door for people to represent themselves more truthfully. Things they may do online they certainly would not do in real life where cultural norms take president.

The scholar responsible for the fatwa mentions a law in Islamic Jurisprudence:
درأ المفسده مقدم على جلب المنفعة,

Pre-empting evil takes precedence over bringing benefit. In other words, Facebook’s evils outweigh its benefits therefore to prevent its evils it should be forbidden.

Simply put, Facebook breaks up families.

Against:

Ironically, one of the clerics who issued the fatwa, (Abd al-Hamid al-Atrash) unwittingly made a compelling argument against the ruling:  (I’m paraphrasing here)

“Facebook, and other means of communication, whether satellite television, is a double-edged weapon, like a knife kitchen, if used in the right place it will achieve its purpose but if used outside the kitchen it becomes corrupt.”

My opinion:

1. A man or woman who is prepared to cheat on their spouse using Facebook, given the chance, will do so in real life.

2. Presuming the survey is accurate, then it’s indicative not so much of social networking sites ‘evils’ as it is an indicator of much deeper problems in Egyptian and I believe Arab societies as a whole. Last year, a fatwa was issued in Jordan prohibiting chatting between sexes.

These Fataws are like trying to plug a hole in a dam with your finger when the dam is about to burst. Mobile phones, television, the internet; the communications revolution has had a profound impact on how we interact. This has left many Muslims with the impression that traditional Muslim societies are under threat. This is entirely understandable.  But trying to treat the problem by refusing to deal with it is not the answer. Excuse the clichés, but we need to stop tackling the symptoms and start treating the causes.

3. I think we can all agree on the usefulness of kitchen knifes. And having them locked away will not do anyone any good. But by teaching people their correct use and instilling in them the values that have insured the safety of kitchen knife users and those in their proximity for so many years, then I am sure everybody will be happy.

Share this opinion on Facebook and while you’re at it, add Moamer here.

  • Zenah

    The kitchen knife analogy is not valid I think. It's more like a new weapon with no instructions manual, and everybody has been using it left and right without being aware thoroughly of the consequences. The openness of Facebook, as well as its acceptance from the society as a whole has made it easier for everyone to create a counter character, or unleash the wild imagination, into a cyber world that people like to believe exists only when its bringing us no harm.

    I like to disagree with your first point. I think it's the other way around. People capable of cheating on their spouses in real life, don't need Facebook to do it. However, those that don't have such courage, for any reason of cultural restrictions or judgments from the surroundings, like in the Arab world, will use Facebook as a portal to release suppressed thoughts as such.

    I don't think the fatwa was radical to be honest. It's logical. Islam in any way urged its people to always look away from whatever is illicit, and promote virtue and prevent vice. So according to Shari'a there's nothing there that sounds too far and illogical.

    The world today has become so dependent on the use of such cyber interactions because it allows people to touch on what's imaginary and that could be due to the lack of real world interactions or the lack of contentment in existing interactions. Therefore, staying away from them leaves the person satisfied with whatever he/she has, or try to search for solutions that are more tangible. Half of those who do cheat on their spouses end up making a bad choice and the person they got involved with is really not worth all that. Of course, you can argue about what is the source of the problem for looking for alternatives. Did we become so reliable on the internet because our lives became boring? Or did we become boring because we're dependent on the nice world where everything looks so harmless? I personally would like to go with the latter. I'm not gonna say people have had wonderful lives before all the social networking fiasco popped up, but they sure had one less route to lead into wrongdoings. And that's what I think that's what the Azhar is highlighting.

  • ahmadtahboub

    Very nice argument from Zenah.

    I personally believe that the “silah thu haddain” analogy is somewhat valid. It's kind of like this: You have a cup and you can fill it with water or alcohol, this determines whether it's Halal or Haram. But, Facebook is increasingly becoming a cup that is served in a night club, and you would not find it difficult to guess what's in it. Even people who seemingly lead a rather “Islamic” life misuse it. In fact, those who party and drink do not need Facebook to unleash their sexuality. They are already damaged, but now with Facebook it is easier to contaminate the rest.

    We would be very unintelligent if we look at Facebook as a website that gives us even the slightest information about a person’s reality. If people want to represent themselves in a fake manner and are not able to do that in real life, Facebook is the ultimate solution.

    I am in no position to say whether it is Halal or Haram, I leave this to the Muftis just as I leave it to the doctor to tell me what the right medications are. It's funny that we accept the informed professional to instruct us with what's right for us in all aspects of our lives, but when it comes to religion we really have to talk it over and over. We never have faith in people of faith.

    But really in the end: “الحلال بيّن والحرام بيّن” and everyone knows exactly why he/she has a Facebook account and what he does with it.

    I deleted my account, not because of the fatwa, but because I found it annoying to find myself checking the profiles of people whom I really don’t give a damn about in real life, and seeing their statuses and whatever they do with mutual friends. (I realize there are settings to control all that, but still)

    But there’s also the question of privacy and how the “I agree” that we all clicked as we signed on gives information not just to our friends but to a company called Facebook and gives it freedom to make us a part of statistics and trends, like how often do we use the word “Islam” in our status. Do you think someone out there might be interested to see how we, the Islamic world, think? Like, let’s say the CIA?

    It gives way much more information than anyone of us would give in real life to people who would know nothing about us. By the way, you can check the “Facebook Data Team” page (sorry I don’t have the link) to see very creepy trends and data gathered from people’s statuses, of course these things they were able or allowed to publish, and you can guess what they can’t or wouldn’t publish!

  • Moamer Khalayleh

    Zenah, human interaction is as old as time. Morals and ethics are universal, those that apply to 'real life' interactions are the same as those that apply to written interactions; whether a letter, an e-mail or a facebook wall post.
    As Muslims, I think we both agree that Islam is a religion “لكل زمان ومكان” for every time and place. To dismiss facebook as a 'new weapon with no instruction manual' is to assume that Islam hasn't given us the ability to deal with it. Again, it is a tool.
    Just as facebook has made it easier to 'create a counter character or unleash the wild imagination' it has also made it easier to interact with family and friends in a way that is completely devoid to moral ambiguity. The fact that there are people who use it for the former is a problem with the people and not the tool.
    Social networking sites have allowed people to express themselves freely. Instead of 'freaking out' and rushing to forbid them we should learn to deal with them properly.
    The current situation in the Arab world is that we have a growing youth population who are unable to meet their needs in terms of relations with the other sex due to social restrictions, the only lawful way, marriage, is made extremely difficult by cultural. It's this which leads to many people using the social networking sites the way they do.

    Ahmed, you could say the same thing about mobile phones, satelite tv and the internet as a whole. I'm sure that mobile phones are responsible for more illicit relationships in the Arab world than facebook has ever been. where then do we draw the line? Should we forbid mobile phones, satelite tv and the internet?
    Actually, I read about a piece of research recently that suggests that people represent themselves on facebook more truthfully than they do in real life, even if the do not use their real names.
    The internet allows people to project a more accurate manifestation of their subconscious than in society because they are free of social restraints.

  • ahmadtahboub

    It really comes back to “الحلال بيّن والحرام بيّن” in cell phones, satellite TV and the internet. Unless our fellow “Muslims” who use these communication methods have a completely western upbringing, they would know what is right and what is wrong. If they choose to create their own principles and have a personalized set of ideologies, then there’s nothing much we can do about it.

    I agree with you that cell phones have a much worse effect, just yesterday an acquaintance decided to show me some unbelievable text messages from a girl he didn’t even know in person. Cell phones provide a “safer” environment than Facebook for illicit behavior, because then for example, the person you’re talking to might not know who your friends are and even what you look like.

    The answer to your question on where we draw the line is a resounding “I don’t know”. I do not have a magic wand or a genius master plan. I do, however, firmly believe having what I like to call the “practical utopia” which is an Islamic ruling society will indeed, as it has done before, solve the entire world’s problems.

    Do I think we’re having a lot of impulsive Fatwas? Yes, I do. But instead of getting worked up by that and calling Islam and Muslims stupid (Some people do that, I’m not saying you did) because they don’t agree with what I want or think is right, instead, I try to think well of the Muftis. They’re trying to fix things with what they think is right, they’re only trying to help.

    The thing is not about banning the internet or cell phones, the solution, I believe, to avoid promiscuity and illicit behavior is very, very simple (in principle not in practice)! Stop ignoring sexuality, and let guys and girls who all want to have sex have it the right way! Marriage! Of course making people look at marriage differently and not as “the end of their freedom” might be nearly impossible, but if people look at it like that and getting married at 18 is very common, I predict there would be a huge drop in illicit behavior! It never fully disappears, of course, that’s why we have punishment for that in Islam, but then, at least, fathers would stop worrying about their daughters being promiscuous! And all this sexual frustration young men and women have would vanish! If a guy or a girl has a spouse, they wouldn’t need phone sex, or porn.

    I have a lot more to say about all this but my comment is getting too long.

    Finally, you said “even if they do not use their real names” and this alone removes any amount of truth that might be there.

  • Ahmad Tahboub

    It turns out they didn't even say it's Haram..!

    http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=…

  • Tamer

    Nice article Moamer :) your comments make a stronger point though..
    nice job!

  • Abeer

    @Ahmad Tahboub: I got few comments on your posts above..

    “Unless our fellow “Muslims” who use these communication methods have a completely western upbringing they would know what is right and what is wrong”.
    This is a very strong statement, don't you think so. I know this if not exactly the topic of this article, but it's difficult to let a statement like this pass without a comment. It sounds to me very ignorant to dismiss people's ethics and morals, and even their ability to tell right from wrong based on such a generalisation. It's not only the Arabs or even muslims for that matter who have ethics. If you don't agree with the way other people live, it's doesn't mean they're wrong or have no ethics… Ahmad, this attitude is called racism.

    “[Muftis] They’re trying to fix things with what they think is right, they’re only trying to help.” so does that mean that we are supposed to take everything Muftis says without arguing or further thinking about it. I strong disagree with this. I believe we have the right to argue, analyse and even refuse some fatwas. Most of religious fatwas are based on Muftis own interpretations and preferences, which is not wrong at all, but it is very – and I stress Very- wrong to take our right to discuss and ask about it.

    “but if people look at it like that and getting married at 18 is very common, I predict there would be a huge drop in illicit behaviour!”. I am not sure if I am reading this correctly, but are you suggesting that encouraging marriage at early age such as 18, will help prevent promiscuity?
    Do you think that have a sexual intercourse if a valid reason to get married?

  • Ahmad Tahboub

    First, thank you for your unusual interest in everything I have to say.

    Racism:

    You are taking the first quote out of context, and I really don’t think it is at all strong. And I completely agree that different people have different values, and I actually respect that! Can you believe it? All I was saying was that a Muslim who allows himself/herself to have their lives governed by Islam would automatically know that for example having a facebook account just to check out pictures of the other sex is wrong, while using facebook to communicate with friends and family is right. Other people with other values might not see anything wrong with using facebook to hook up with strangers for example. So, this nonexistent Fatwa (check out the link in one of my comments, there’s no such Fatwa) may serve as a reminder to those who would like their lives to be governed by Islam. That’s all there is to it. Please tell me how that is racism? And what attitude you’re referring to? Also, why make idealizations? If you don’t agree with what people do in their lives you automatically think they’re wrong, hence the disagreement. You can’t say they don’t have ethics (which I never did), but your disagreement is a result of your thinking they’re wrong.

    About agreeing with Muftis:

    When you want to fix your pipes you go to a plumber, because they know more about it than you do. When you go to the doctor, they may give you a very sour medicine and even put a painful syringe somewhere, and even though we hate that, we still believe it is best for us. We never argue with the engineer on why he put that wall that way, not because we are incapable of understanding, but because they studied the subject, they know more, and more importantly because we “have faith” in them. I was not discouraging the acts of thinking, arguing and discussing. I was merely promoting trust in a world were trust is labeled naïve or even ignorant.

    You seem to have ignored the fact that I said that we do have a lot of impulsive Fatwas. And also, by saying Fatwas are based upon a person’s preferences, you seem to not know what the definition of a Fatwa is, please be patient and check the following points I copied from this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatw%C4%81#History

    “According to the usul al-fiqh (principles of jurisprudence), the fatwa must meet the following conditions in order to be valid:
    1.The fatwa is in line with relevant legal proofs, deduced from Qur'anic verses and hadith; provided the hadith was not later abrogated by Muhammad.
    2.It is issued by a person (or a board) having due knowledge and sincerity of heart;
    3.It is free from individual opportunism, and not depending on political servitude;
    4.It is adequate with the needs of the contemporary world.”

    Argue all you want, and think all you want, that is highly encouraged, in the end, there’s this little voice inside all of us that knows what’s right and what’s wrong. How exactly am I taking your right to analyze? I couldn’t if I wanted to! I said this exactly: “I try to think well of them.” I never said all the people in the world must do that!

    Marriage:

    Why does it sound so outrageous to even think of marriage at a young age? When did your grandmother and grandfather get married? Was there less illicit behavior in that bygone era? You are most certainly reading this correctly! And YES! I am suggesting if we marry younger, we as a society would be happier and have more willingness to excel in other aspects, and maybe, just maybe, we would start having industries, scientists, and even artists!

    Please be patient again and check the pyramid in this link:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy…

    As you can see sex lies in the base of the pyramid, fulfill it, and you’ll go up! Fulfilling it while preserving the society’s virtue can only be accomplished through marriage. This of course is the Islamic view, but I think what happens in the US for example from breakdown of families, murder of fetuses (abortion), and other dismal outcomes, is a strong proof of what would happen if we choose other paths. This is my opinion, feel free to disagree. Having sex is a very important cause for marriage; it’s why your grandfather did it! It is not however the only. I never said that. Had it been the case, marriage would be no different than a casual hook up. Please don’t put words in my mouth.

    Thanks again!

  • khaledhakim

    Get over it everyone… Deep down inside the human race is in an internal, spiritual, and emotional state of turmoil. Whether you feel it now, or will come to that realization later on, something in all of this is causing permanent damage to who we are…

    Amidst the storm of this new age of information we are are losing ourselves, our values, our beliefs and in short we as humans are losing our humane virtues.

  • commentguest

    عن النعمان بن بشير رضي الله عنه قال سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم يقول (إن الحلال بين والحرام بين وبينهما أمور مشتبهات لا يعلمهن كثير من الناس فمن اتقى الشبهات استبرأ لدينه وعرضه ومن وقع في الشبهات وقع في الحرام كالراعي يرعى حول الحمى يوشك أن يرتع فيه ألا وإن لكل ملك حمى ألا وإن حمى الله محارمه ألا وإن في الجسد مضغه إذا صلحت صلح الجسد كله وإذا فسدت فسد الجسد كله ألا وهي القلب) متفق عليه.

    so saying إن الحلال بين والحرام بين and not telling the Hadeeth to the end is not enough. I won't comment since I guess people are smart enough to interpret this Hadeeth. You can always read what it means. Scholars would explain it better than I would.

  • http://www.dior-store.com/Dior-homme.html uggs outlet

    The post is very well.So I often come in .I believe all of us like fashion. Recently,I browse the web ,I found these websites are pretty good. Let everybody can be satisfied.Dior homme shoes

  • http://www.dior-store.com/Dior-homme.html uggs outlet

    The post is very well.So I often come in .I believe all of us like fashion. Recently,I browse the web ,I found these websites are pretty good. Let everybody can be satisfied.Dior homme shoes

  • http://www.watchtvontheinternetlive.com/ WATCH tv on my pc

    i would love to have a guest post here…do you offer any guest post here so what you e-mail so I can mail for further process if you are interested